 |
 |
 |
|
Re: Not giving away anything...
Maybe you're right. So do you recommend that papers continue to charge a premium only for print, and make everything else free? If so, I could live with that. My main point in that post was that print continues to survive as an advantage, not a liability -- and that this advantage shouldn't be undermined. I'm wondering... what is the evidence that papers (or magazines) are hurt or helped by exposing current print editorial on the Web? Time Magazine reveals all of it. So does the San Francisco Chronicle. I'd like to see a long-term study of what exposed current and archival editorial (which I refuse to call "content") does both for the publications' bottom lines and for their reputations in general.
|
