 |
 |
 |
|
Re: Thursday, August 24, 2006
"the neat moniker and pithy slogan raises interest and development in an area that publishers and users have both back-burnered up until now" Raising interest is great, but it's hardly been back-burnered. Work on mobile/ubiquitous access to the web has never been more dynamic. The treatment of information as a flow underlies many conceptual/architectural models around programming and media delivery (i.e. publishing). I find it really strange that it takes a little hack (state of the art maybe 2001) and a pithy slogan for this to appear on a lot of people's radar. It's as if the blogosphere ends at techmeme. "publishers find a new and appropriate way to distribute editorial" - hopefully yes. "Appropriate" including aspects like following known best practices on the web, and respecting other people's copyright.
|
