|
Re: Next time we meet
I've alresdy done comparisons with my pretty-good Minolta film setup, which served me well for many years. (After the Nikon, and then the Pentax, setups were stolen.)
I came late to digital photography -- I only bought the 2002-vintage Nikon Coolpix 5700 after it was discontinued and discounted in April 2004 -- because I didn't see any results that I thought competed with film photography.
I still think the best film still beats all but the best digital.
But what I've saved so far, in film and printing expenses, alone makes the difference worth it.
Also the fact that I can post immediately on Flickr, 23hq, Bubbleshare, BuzzNet or wherever.
Your Canon rocks, by the way. If you have the time and the money, think about getting one of the best of the new Canon digitals. I'd consider the 20D or the 30D the bottom of that range. Your lenses should work.
Copyright 2009 The Doc Searls Weblog
|