 |
 |
 |
|
Re: Wednesday, June 29, 2005
No! You've got the inverse square law all wrong. That sentence should read "That means the signal strength can be one quarter (one fourth) the value at twice the distance: .125mv at 6 meters, 0.03125mv at 12 meters and so on. " What you're describing would be an inverse law, not an inverse square law. Fortunately, the link you've provided does describe it correctly.
|
