|
Re: Constructive Conversation - Part II
Ed-
I posted a response to your message yesterday, but it got lost somewhere, so I'll try again. You, of course, posted in reply to one of Doc's responses to me, but I assume that I can respond also.
Your questions about converstations and communities make my point even better than I. Conversation is complicated by poetic license, thus requiring clarification of meaning for real conversation to take place.
For me, conversation is the interchange of information bewteen two individuals, thus this is a seperate conversation between you and I. You responded to a conversation between Doc and I, and I am responding to your statements and questions.
Which brings me to your second paragraph where you ask far too many questions for a simple conversation. Could you simplify that paragraph a bit, as I don't intend to publish a book here.
Thanks for responding.
Copyright 2009 The Doc Searls Weblog
|