|
Re: Thursday, January 20, 2005
Your characterisations of PR are gratuitous. Journalists criticise media more often than not because they are ashamed of just how much they rely on PR for information and research and story ideas. Its tedious listening to the relentless self-congratulatory tone of journalists.
I'm amazed at Rebecca Blood's comment. She says she has never read any of the weblogs mentioned in Rosen's sloppy reporting yet she goes onto make a sweeping generalisation about what they cover and write about etc and their purpose.
This is a new height scaled in the arrogant disregard for accuracy that is endemic in many blogs.
How you can cite this self-identified nonsense as the best response is beyond me.
There are responses to this message:
Copyright 2009 The Doc Searls Weblog
|