|
Saturday, April 26, 2003
Ain't nothin' more social than a buncha pix 
It was all about ambiguity, sort of
| | Some dialoge from their breakfast: |
| | DW: Explicitness is an act of violence. You think it¹s archeological: You take something and dust it off, but in fact explicitness reduces things; it destroys. Š.That¹s why groups stay away from constitution writing. |
| | ED: But they don¹t stay away from constitution-writing. It¹s more like moths to a flame. They can¹t stop it. But they can¹t handle the explicitness. It¹s like pre-nuptial agreements. |
| | DW: And the same with digital ID, Web personas. We¹re drawn to them, but they¹re destructive. |
| | DW: But I¹m ending with hope. That there¹s now hope for social software to move from its past — harsh and glaring and topdown — to a new, emergent, bottom-up form that preserves the ambiguity. There¹s an art to doing explicitness well, so that it¹s not destructive. |
| | This is exactly what I hope to see from a mydentity-based infrastructure. |
Fall conference planning
Peace on
| | Dean: Incorrigible Peacenik. Opposition to the war (and to the regime currently occupying the Oval Office, et al) and support for the troops are not mutually exclusive. |
Weaving the World Live Web
Relationshipping
| | Openness trumps legality, PR, accounting, advertising, good intentions, pricing, litigation and every other mechanism that convinces us it's a good idea to buy over-hyped commodities and sell an hour of our time for $20 so the company can resell it for $60. A single email may be enough openness to bring bankers down who once would have moved quietly on to another firm to do it all over again. When reputation data is too broadly distributed to be hidden and too obvious to be spun, we'll have recaptured the User Interface enjoyed by generations of traders in the stalls of Chaldea, relating to generations of customers, teaching the world how to serve the customer and the bottom line. |
| | It's chapter of a book that needs to be written. Dig it. |
Pray for piece
There are responses to this message:
Copyright 2009 The Doc Searls Weblog
|
