|
Monday, February 11, 2002
Previous topic
|
Next topic
|
|
 Monday, February 11, 2002
started 2/12/2002; 12:58:59 PM - last post 2/13/2002; 4:57:37 PM
|
|
Doc Searls - Monday, February 11, 2002 
2/12/2002; 4:58:59 PM (reads: 4555, responses: 3)
|
|
|
|
Matthew Thomas - Alas, none of your Googlewhacks are genuine
2/13/2002; 2:45:59 AM (reads: 1407, responses: 2)
|
|
|
|
Vincent Hill - Re: a genuine googlewhack
2/13/2002; 1:24:10 PM (reads: 878, responses: 0)
|
|
|
I found a googlewhack, at least it meets the criteria of being in the dictionary and returning 1 page with a google search. The words are "temerarious" and "cuneiform".
discuss
|
|
Abie Hadjitarkhani - Alas, Bitten by the Googlewhack Bug
2/13/2002; 8:57:37 PM (reads: 831, responses: 0)
|
|
|
What is it about Googlewhacking that's so compelling? I managed to keep from getting sucked in for so long, and then, after Doc's post and Matthew's response, I gave in and now who knows where it will end?
[http://www.bluvox.com/2002/02/13.html]
discuss
|
|
|
Copyright 2009 The Doc Searls Weblog
|
