|
| Saturday, July 26, 2003 |
 |
Aside from being incomplete and wrong, it was okay 
| | ...to the extent the article suggests a blogging lawyer must dissimulate and dissemble to avoid alienating clients, it perpetuates insular thinking and ignores the realities of the modern business world, which thankfully is populated by individuals with a broad range of interests and concerns. |
| | ...the writer Stephanie Ward apparently had some trouble distinguishing between comments I was making and comments I told her others had made on similar topics.... The quotes and attribution somehow got left out of her piece, but one of the benefits of having a weblog is the ability to supply such things where, as here, they have been neglected or cut. |
| | ...I think the same thing goes for Howard Bashman, who inaccurately is described in the article as someone who "does not discuss personal issues on his blog." Anyone passingly familiar with How Appealing recognizes that Howard's passions and personality, and the way they come through in his writing, are an enormous part of what makes his weblog exceptional. |
| | And, as they say in bad TV ads for stuff you'll never buy, that's not all! |
| | In Read On, Denise adds a pile of links under this opener: |
| | I was about to address this post to anyone visiting from today's ABA Journal eReport article on lawyer blogs, then remembered that eReport articles supply no hyperlinks... |
| | Clue du jour: Never cross a lawyer who buys her pixels by the barrel and ships them by the (clue)trainload. And for free, no less. |
| | I'm beginning to see that a successful weblog, like any successful writing, must allow the reader to sense a connection with the writer. And though it's awkward for an institutional blogger like me, it is possible for passions and personality to come through, while keeping the content focused and appropriate. But it is definitely not easy. |
Department of Repetition Department
discuss
Copyright 2008 The Doc Searls Weblog
|
